About $700,000 in provincial funding is missing for Grande Prairie area municipalities.

Funding for water, wastewater and solid waste management is missing for the shareholders of Aquatera: the City of Grande Prairie, County of Grande Prairie, and the towns of Sexsmith and Wembley.

“Because we don’t directly own it, we’re not getting credit for it,” said City of Grande Prairie Mayor Jackie Clayton.  

The province this year changed its funding model to the Local Government Funding Framework (LGFF), replacing the Municipal Sustainability Initiative (MSI). 

The LGFF formula considers the value of infrastructure assets such as water, wastewater and solid waste infrastructure … but only those directly owned by the municipality.

Municipalities with infrastructure owned by a municipal controlled corporation (MCC) like Aquatera are not included.

The City of Chestermere is also in a similar position, not receiving funding for some of its assets owned by Enmax. 

“If 99 per cent of municipalities in Alberta are receiving funding for their water and wastewater infrastructure, it’s not fair to the five municipalities that aren’t,” said Dylan Bressey, Alberta Municipalities (ABMunis) director of cities up to 500,000 and city councillor.

“Our ratepayers should get the same treatment from the provincial government as water and wastewater ratepayers get across the rest of the province.”

Councils are writing letters to Minister of Municipal Affairs Ric McIver to change the LGFF formula to allow MCCs for consideration in the funding formula. 

“The reality is in Canada, municipalities own the majority of public infrastructure,” said Bressey.

“Municipalities deliver the services that residents interact with the most in a day, and we collect less than 10 per cent of the tax revenue, so when we own most of the public infrastructure, and we create less than 10 per cent of the taxes, we just can’t fund infrastructure without these grants from senior levels of government.”

City of Grande Prairie Mayor Jackie Clayton says the city is the largest shareholder of Aquatera (about 73 per cent) and believes it could be missing about $500,000 from its LGFF allotment this year due to the new formula. 

LGFF can include roads, bridges, public transit vehicles and facilities, and municipal buildings such as recreation and sports facilities. 

Aquatera benefits

“There’s a huge benefit of having a service like Aquatera; it’s played a key role in promoting regional collaboration for economic growth, but it also made sure that municipalities don’t have to provide their own duplicate of their own service of water/wastewater infrastructure,” said Clayton.

Bressey said municipalities across the province have redundant systems where pipes run next to each other for multiple systems.

Sexsmith Mayor Kate Potter said Aquatera benefits residents with a stable and quality water supply. 

“I think of our previous mayors who would lose sleep over whether or not water would be available or if there was an issue what they would do; I don’t have those same concerns because I have a lot of confidence in the system in the MCC,” said Potter. 

She noted that when the town had a water main break two years ago, it was quickly fixed because Aquatera had the expertise compared to the municipality needing to find solutions. 

 “Aquatera really is what the province should want all municipalities to use when they work together well,” said Bressey.

“It’s such a no-brainer that we don’t get punished for doing what really other municipalities should do is getting together with the partners and saying, how are we going to run a system together rather than doing it on our own.”

He said the issue was brought up with the province before the funding allocation.

“I am hopeful that Municipal Affairs is looking for a solution that helps Alberta residents,” said Potter.

Aquatera, created in 2003, is a regional collaboration to “eliminate the need for redundant water and wastewater systems in the region,” according to the city.

Less infrastructure funding leaves municipalities with tough decisions

The Aquatera water and wastewater facility in Grande Prairie, Alta. on Monday, May 6, 2024. About $700,000 in provincial funding is missing for Grande Prairie area municipalities, because the province doesn’t recognize their ownership of water and wastewater infrastructure. (Photo by Jesse Boily)Jesse Boily

Local municipalities are grappling with rising infrastructure costs and less cash from the province. 

The province is handing out about $4 million less to local municipalities in 2024 than it did in 2011. 

“If we had the same infrastructure funding as we had back in 2011, then that’s a huge property tax decrease we could have,” said Dylan Bressey, Alberta Municipalities (ABMunis) director of cities up to 500,000 and city councillor.

Cuts to infrastructure funding have left municipalities with few choices such as raising local taxes or allowing critical infrastructure to deteriorate. 

The province funds infrastructure such as roads, bridges, public transit vehicles and facilities, water and wastewater, and municipal buildings for recreation and sports. 

In 2024, the City of Grande Prairie received about $1.7 million less than it did in 2011.

Other local municipalities have also seen funding cuts compared to the 2011 funding levels: County of Grande Prairie -$1.4 million, Saddle Hills County -$694,600, Town of Beaverlodge -$13,200, and Town of Wembley -$86,400.

“All municipalities are struggling, just because the base funding amount is so low that it really is having an impact on everyone,” said Bressey. 

The province began its new funding formula for municipalities this year. The Local Government Funding Framework (LGFF) replaces the Municipal Sustainability Initiative (MSI) formula.

The province allotted $724 million to LGFF this year, but ABMunis says it should be around $1.75 billion.

“It’s about a billion dollars short of where it should be; it’s less than half of what MSI used to be funded, and the impact of that has been that municipalities are having to choose between allowing their infrastructure to crumble or drastically raising their property taxes,” said Bressey. “$1.75 billion, it’s not just a number we pulled out of nowhere; it is justified; it’s about half the cost that municipalities are seeing every year to depreciate their assets and build new assets.

“It’s less than we’d be receiving if MSI had kept up with population plus inflation growth,” he said.

According to ABmunis, in 2011 the province provided about $424 per capita for infrastructure; in 2023 it was $154 per capita. 

“Municipalities, on the whole, have taken a decrease in funding,” said Sexsmith Mayor Kate Potter. 

She said Sexsmith is only now getting back to similar funding levels from 2011. The town received $499,000 in 2011; in 2024 it was allocated $535,000. 

Potter said that since 2011 Sexsmith has seen population growth, the cost of goods increase, and the town take on additional costs such as policing due to the province’s police funding model.

Physician attraction and retention is an additional cost, the mayor said.

“Because Sexsmith doesn’t have an AHS facility, AHS doesn’t recruit physicians for our community; it’s up to us to make sure that we have or that we’re working with the local physicians to make sure that they are fully staffed,” said Potter.

“We’ve worked really hard to try and keep fairly stable taxes, and we’ve cut in a lot of areas, so we’re always looking at money-saving efforts,” she said, noting that the council is currently exploring different cost-saving measures, such as cutting the council size.

Additionally, local shareholders of Aquatera – the City of Grande Prairie, the County of Grande Prairie, and the towns of Sexsmith and Wembley – collectively believe they are missing about $700,000 in infrastructure funding because LGFF does not recognize their water and wastewater assets because the municipally controlled corporation owns them.

“Because we don’t directly own it, we’re not getting credit for it,” said City of Grande Prairie Mayor Jackie Clayton. 

She said most other municipalities receive credit for their systems and more funding for their municipality under the LGFF formula. 

LGFF has enabled some municipalities to plan the future better. 

“The provincial government of the day heard on a regular basis from municipalities that they wanted consistent and predictable funding,” said Clayton. 

Bressey said LGFF uses a predictable formula so municipalities can look ahead.

Additionally, LGFF is also tied to provincial revenues, so if the province gains more revenue, so do municipalities. However, if revenue is down, municipalities don’t receive additional funding. 

“I really appreciate that one-to-one growth model for revenue increases, but the reality is that we’re working with a lot less than we have historically, and when the cost is rising so much, that really ends up affecting our residents more than anything else,” said Potter. 

By Jesse Boily, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter

Original Published on May 09, 2024 at 12:10

This item reprinted with permission from   Town & Country News   Beaverlodge, Alberta

Comments are Welcome - Use the 'Join the Discussion' above any replies, or 'TheRegional / Chat' below replies. Both links take you to the same place. You will be asked to become a registered user if you are not one already - Posts are moderated